“What difference does it make to the future of this country whether Obama was born on U.S. soil? Advocates of this destructive campaign will argue that the constitutional principle regarding the qualifications for president trumps all others. But how viable will out Constitution be if five Supreme Court justices should decide to void 64 million ballots?”
Well Mr. Horowitz, this is what I have to say to you. First on the point of the Supreme Court. It would not be the Supreme Court that would void 64 million ballots, it would be the fact that Obama can or can not prove via a “Certificate of Live Birth” vs a “Certification of Live Birth”, which are two totally different documents in Hawaii that he is a natural born citizen of the United States. Yes, yes, go ahead and quote “Fact Check”, but also remember that previously “Fact Check” had posted that Obama was a British Citizen….. I’ll be more than happy to pull up a cap of the page when it stated that.
Secondly, as to constitutional principle, lets take a look at the First Amendment, which allows you the right to freedom of speech and freedom of press to show your stupidity and Socialism. If you don’t want to follow the Constitution regarding the next President of the United States, this also include abolishing the First Amendment soooo… say bye, bye to that right. In other words….
SHUT UP ABOUT THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE HOROWITZ. And if you want to pick and choose which Constitutional rights and laws you want to follow, why don’t you EXERCISE YOUR FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT?
Its not sore “loserism”, because I neither voted Republican nor Democrat. In fact, I hated them both equally. And it’s not “radical” to want to follow the Constitution of the United States. Anyone who does not support the Constitution is un-American, is that what you are trying to say about yourself?
Since when is protecting the Constitution radical, unless your a Socialist. Oh wait.. you were once a supporter of Marxism as well as a member of the New Left in the 1960s, and are the son of two life-long members of the Communist Party.. what was I thinking….
Oh and yes, you once stated in an interview that, “I grew up in a community that was part of a vast international conspiracy, just as the anti-Communists said it was. It was orchestrated from Moscow, funded by the Kremlin and it had treason in its heart.” --- Ummm.. okay.. who’s wearing a tin foil hat now?
And let’s not forget about your friend Huey P. Newton of the Blank Panthers to whom you provided legal and financial assistance to.
The fact is that according to you, the birth certificate is a factual question, not a constitutional question. Well, sweetie, lemme inform you of something. If the birth certificate is void, null, bogus (choose your word here), and Obama can not produce a valid, certified (choose your word here) birth certificate, then it does become a Constitutional issue.
And the last time I checked, the Supreme Court, by history, has interpreted the Constitution of the United States, and interpreted Federal laws, as does ANY judge in the United States and jury in the United States. Interpret the law as you understand it, and then judge on your interpretation and understanding of that law.
It would not undermine the unity of the country, it would show serious lapses in how one can legally become President of the United States. There are NO checks and balances for this process.
Your claim to be a conservative, yet you do not wish to uphold the Constitution is an embarrassment to all conservatives.
Here’s the bottom line:
■ The point about Obama and his birth certificate is the fact that he has spent nearly $800,000 or $80,000 (I’ve seen both) on lawyers to NOT show the document.
■ Obama claims, in one of his books, Dreams I believe, that he found his original birth certificate in a book that belonged to his mother after her death. It to stand to reason that he would still be in possession of it, since he was considering running for office when she died.
■ The fact that his Grandmother in Kenya stated she was present at his birth in Kenya.
■ The facts that his sister stated he was born at two different hospitals in Hawaii.
■ The fact that you don’t have to be born in Hawaii, or even the US to have a “Certification of Live Birth” from Hawaii, but you DO have to be born in Hawaii to have a “Certificate of Live Birth”. The two documents are totally different.
■ The fact that the man simply won’t show the document is the bottom line. What is the problem with showing the document if you have nothing to hide? Why fight showing it to end the debate and earn trust in those who don’t believe him? What is there too loose, other than being shown as a fraud and loosing the eligibility as the next President of the United States? Oh wait…..
■ It is not those who want to see the birth certificate that are keeping this alive. It is Obama himself by not doing a simple task that everyone else in the United States has to do to prove citizenship.
And oh yea, I’ve been compared to Michael Savage (although I originally had no idea who the guy was, and as of this moment, I’ve never listened to him) and told I make Rush Limbaugh look like a Democrat (whom I hated very much in the early 90s and haven’t listened to him since). And no, I have no problem with unseating ANY PERSON, who has used bogus documents, no matter what position they held, to fraudulently obtain a position. If that is radical and un-American, I guess it’s time for me to find a new country to live in.
Oh an you know I had to post the cartoon on the right, since Horowitz just LOVES it. And it’s also protected by the First Amendment.