Showing posts with label Administration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Administration. Show all posts

Obama Asks Bush To Notify Congress To Show Him The Money.

1/13/2009 03:38:00 AM

(0) Comments

19_baracksmassivecash_lg2 First, remember that Obama CONSTANTLY says that there is only one President, and only one Administration at a time.  He’s used that line many times recently to duck hard questions.

Obama has asked Bush to notify Congress “on his behalf” that he wants to access the second half of the $700 billion fund, according to White House press secretary Dana Perino.

The idea is to make the money available to the new administration shortly after Obama takes office Jan. 20th.

So if there is only one President at a time, or one Administration at a time, then why did Obama ask Bush to notify Congress that he wants the money?  I mean seriously… I’m REALLY starting to HATE Obama’s morals and ethics, or rather, lack of.

Via FOX.

Click Here To Read The Rest Of This Post! (Opens in a new window.)

Obama Expects Americans To “Sacrifice” For Economy.

1/13/2009 02:53:00 AM

(0) Comments

Obama is now saying that fixing the economy over the long term will require “sacrifice” from every American and scaling back some of his campaign promises.

“Our challenge is going to be identifying what works and putting more money into that, eliminating things that don’t work, and making things that we have more efficient.  But I’m not suggesting, George, I want to be realistic here, not everything that we talked about during the campaign are we going to be able to do on the pace we had hoped.”

Gee, what a surprise.  Obama, the Savior, who promised the moon, the sun and the stars to get elected, is now doing what I expected, and what all politicians do, and going back on his campaign promises.

"At the end of the day, are you really talking about over the course of your presidency some kind of grand bargain? That you have tax reform, healthcare reform, entitlement reform including Social Security and Medicare, where everybody in the country is going to have to sacrifice something, accept change for the greater good?"

"Yes," Obama said.

"And when will that get done?"

"Well, right now, I’m focused on a pretty heavy lift, which is making sure we get that reinvestment and recovery package in place. But what you described is exactly what we’re going to have to do. What we have to do is to take a look at our structural deficit, how are we paying for government? What are we getting for it? And how do we make the system more efficient?"

"And eventually sacrifice from everyone?"

"Everybody’s going to have to give. Everybody’s going to have to have some skin in the game," Obama said.

Gee, is this the way to get every American to “serve” in Obama’s Socialist Administration? 

Click Here To Read The Rest Of This Post! (Opens in a new window.)

Misery Index

, , ,

The UAW Has Blood On Their Hands While We, The US Taxpayers Have Dirt In Our Faces. [Bailout]

12/19/2008 02:49:00 PM

(0) Comments

JCPenny catalog2Your own little Detroit, just in time for Christmas!   And again I state, if the UAW is so good, then why is Detroit in trouble?  Why don’t the import auto makers have problems?  Why aren’t they screaming for a bailout?  The difference between the two?  The UAW.

This morning President Bush announced that his Administration, acting unilaterally after Congress declined to intervene, due to the UAW refusing to make concessions, will bail out the auto industry to the tune of $13.4 billon now, and possibly another $4 billion in February.  “The time to make hard decisions to become viable is now, or the only option will be bankruptcy,” Bush said.  “The automakers and unions must understand what is at stake and make hard decisions necessary to reform.”

The White House admits that it consulted with Obama on the loan package.  They briefed the Obama transition team over the last several days and options under consideration, according to a transition aide not authorized to speak publicly.  White House spokesman Joel Kaplan confirmed that there had been “consultations ongoing” between the two sides but he declined to go into specifics.  The financing will be drawn from the $700 billion TARP, the fund set aside in October to bailout Wall Street firms and banks.

Obama issued a statement on the bailout loan to Detroit:

Today’s actions are a necessary step to help avoid a collapse in our auto industry that would have devastating consequences for our economy and our workers.  With the short-term assistance provided by this package, the auto companies must bring all their stakeholders together – including labor, dealers, creditors and suppliers – to make the hard choices necessary to achieve long-term viability.  The auto companies must not squander this chance to reform bad management practices and begin the long-term restricting that is absolutely required to save this critical industry and the millions of American jobs that depend on it.

DETAILS ON THE “LOAN”

Here’s a sneak peek of the plan, as released by the White House:

  • Amount:  Auto manufacturers will be provided with $13.4 billion in a short-term financing from the TARP, with an additional $4 billion available in February, contingent upon drawing down the second batch of TARP funds.
  • Viability Requirement:  The firms must use these funds to become financially viable.  Taxpayers will not be asked to provide financing for firms that do not become viable.  If the firms have not attained viability by March 31, 2009, the loan will be called and all funds returned to the Treasury.
  • Definition of Viability:  A firm will only be deeded viable if it has a positive net present value, taking into account all current and future costs, and can fully repay the government loan.
  • Binding Terms and Conditions:  The binding terms and conditions established by the Treasury will mirror those that were voted favorably by a majority of both Houses of Congress, including:
    • Firms must provide warrants for non-voting stock.
    • Firms must accept limits on executive compensation and eliminate perks such as corporate jets. [The companies must show the White House they are “taking all reasonable steps” to sell aircraft or interest in aircraft.  And they must provide plans to control their expenses that would include details about spending on holiday parties, travel and new real estate.]
    • Debt owed to the government would be senior to other debts, to the extent permitted by law.
    • Firms must allow the government to examine their books and records.
    • Firms must report and the government has the power to block any large transactions (> $100 million).
    • Firms must comply with applicable Federal fuel efficiency and emissions requirements.
    • Firms must not issue new dividends while they owe government debt.
  • Targets:  The terms and conditions established by Treasury will include additional targets that were the subject of Congressional negotiations but did not come to a vote, including:
    • Reduce debts by 2/3 via a debt for equity exchange. [The companies would need to provide the government with restructuring plans by Feb 17.  Those plans would need to show the companies and their subsidiaries have used their best efforts to reduce outstanding unsecured public debt, with the exception of pension and employment benefits obligations, by two-thirds.]
    • Make one-half of VEBA payments in the form of stock.  [The White House has called for the automakers to make 1/2 of the approximate $21 billion owned to UAW retiree health-care trust in stock instead of cash.]
    • Eliminate the jobs bank. [The bank provides nearly full pay to union workers on long-term layoff.  The workers receive normal unemployment benefits however, the jobs bank provides compensation that would make the workers benefits, while on layoff, equal to about 95% of their weekly income.]
    • Work rules that are competitive with transplant auto manufactures by 12/31/09. [Meaning equal to that of Nissan, Toyota or Honda however, the U.S. Treasury has changed its stance, saying it had identified an error it wanted to correct to make terms of the package consistent with its intent.]
    • Wages that are competitive with those of transplant auto manufacturers by 12/31/09.
    In addition, the firm will be required to conclude new agreements with its other major stake holders, including dealers and suppliers, by March 31, 2009.


    These terms and conditions would be non-binding in the sense that negotiations can deviate from the quantitative targets above, providing that the firm reports the reasons for these deviations and make the business case to achieve long-term viability in spite of the deviations.

    Interest on the loans is currently set at 5% for three years.  In the event of a default, interest rates could rise to 800 basis points above either Libor or 2%, whichever is greater and is payable immediately.

    The companies would need to provide the government with weekly status reports, beginning this week.  The reports would need to detail companies’ 13—week rolling cash forecasts.  The companies also are required to provide biweekly liquidity status reports after loan disbursements and monthly certifications of expense policy and compensation compliance.

    WHO GETS WHAT, MAYBE

    GM
    - $17.4 billion.  GM is set to draw $4 billion on Dec. 29, followed by another $5.4 billion on Jan. 16.  Should Congress release a second set of TARP funding, GM would get an additional $4 billion on Feb. 17.

    Chrysler - $4 billion on Dec. 29.

    Ford – Ford is not seeking any assistance.  “As we told Congress, Ford is in a different position.  We do not face a near-term liquidity issue, and we are not seeking short-term financial assistance from the government,” Ford President and CEO Alan Mulally said.  “But all of us at Ford appreciate the prudent step the administration has taken to address the near-term liquidity issues of GM and Chrysler.”

    MEANWHILE THE UAW IS NOT HAPPY ABOUT PAY AND BENEFIT CONCESSION

    If you remember, because the UAW would not make concession, that was the reason that the Republicans said no to the Detroit bailout.  Well, Bush added in that concession, and the UAW is not a happy camper.

    House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D) is calling the wage stipulation “an unfair assault on working men and women” that could force them to accept “a disproportionately large reduction in what is currently legally owed to them.”  The provision, Frank said, “could give foreign auto companies in effect the ability to dictate wages for all American auto workers,” and “it’s outrageous to be giving foreign companies the right to set wages for American workers.”  He is already pushing for Obama to change that portion of the emergency loan package, something the U.S. Treasury said the incoming Administration will have the power to do. 

    House speaker Nancy Pelosi (D) said the White House package “unfortunately singles out workers and clearly put them at a disadvantage before negotiations have even begun.”

    All stakeholders – management, directors, bondholders, suppliers, dealers, workers – will have to participate in shared sacrifices to help the industry move forward,” UAW President Ron Gettelfinger said, noting that the UAW members have already made more substantial sacrifices to help make the domestic auto companies more competitive.  [Those concessions were over a year ago, in an totally different economy.]

    We are disappointed that,” President Bush, “has added unfair conditions signaling out workers,” Gettlefinger said.  “We will work with the Obama administration and the new Congress to ensure that these unfair conditions are removed, as we join in the coming months with all stakeholders to create a viable future for the U.S. auto industry.”

    Because these provisions are unnecessary to achieve our goal and because they were unilaterally inserted by the President into what was otherwise a negotiated agreement, I believe that the incoming administration and the Congress should take whatever step are necessary to remove them,” he said. 

    The UAW has criticized the idea of cutting employment compensation.  “While we appreciate that President Bush has taken the emergency action needed to help America’s auto companies weather the current financial crisis, we are disappointed that he has added unfair conditions singling out workers,” UAW President Ron Gellelfinger said in a statement.

    What the UAW needs to remember, is that this money is a loan to GM and Chrysler, a bailout for the auto makers, the company itself, NOT to the workers.  Because if the company doesn’t exist, then the workers don’t have a job.  If the UAW needs money to continue giving their members the same lifestyle they are use to in pay and benefits, then they should solicit Congress for money and take a loan out themselves.

    TARP


    Then there is the entire issue of the second part of the TARP funds.  Currently of the first $350 billion allocated to the Treasury, the department has committed:

        ■  $315 billion to inject capital into banks and AIG
        ■  $20 billion to unfreeze consumer credit markets
        ■  $13.4 billion for GM and Chrysler

    This leaves the Treasury will less than $2 billion at its disposal.  Treasury Secretary Paulson said that Congress must release the second half of the $700 billion TARP, stating he would meet with lawmakers and Obama’s transition team to discuss when to ask for the rest of the rescue money. 

    But some administration officials suggested that the final decision to request the funds might not come until after Obama takes office.  Treasury officials have grown increasing concerned in recent weeks that they could be left without enough cash to stem another financial crisis, such as the collapse of a bank or other major institution.  But on the other side of the coin, many in Congress have been critical of how the US Treasury has handled the first part of the $350 billion in funding.

    In order for the Treasury to access the second half of TARP, the White House must send Congress a plan detailing how the money would be spent.  Congressional Democrats say they don’t expect a request to come before Jan. 4, when the new Congress is scheduled to convene.

    Once that submission is made to Congress, they have a 15 day window on voting to pass a measure to block release of the money.  If Congress passes a bill to not release the money, then the White House could veto and overrule the congressional vote, but then Congress could also overturn that veto.

    The reason Paulson is talking to the OBama team, is that the timeline for all of this, puts the passage into the first days of Obama’s presidency.  It is unlikely, and I would be very surprised, if Bush petitions Congress to release the money.

    Congressional Democrats say they don’t expect a request to come before Jan. 6, when the new Congress is scheduled to convene.  Once a request is made from the White House, Congress has 15 days to pass a measure that would block release of the money.  Six plus fifteen equals 21, meaning Obama is in office.  Or if Congress passed immediately, Bush could veto the funds which would mean that Obama would have to make the request to Congress, thus adding additional responsibility on Obama’s Administration. 

    OBAMA

    Today’s actions are a necessary step to help avoid a collapse in our auto industry that would have devastating consequences for our economy and our workers,” Obama said.  “With the short-term assistance provided by this package, the auto companies must bring all their stakeholders together including labor, dealers, creditors and suppliers to make the hard choices necessary to achieve long-term viability.”

    Obama has also said that “the American people’s patience is running out.”  He says the automakers should “seize the opportunity” to come up with a plan to make their companies sustainable.

    Obama also said a final restructuring package shouldn’t just include concessions from the workers.  He said they shouldn’t be the ones “taking all the hits”.  Obama says everyone involved with the auto industry has to be “part of the process.” 

    Obama wouldn’t say if he had any specific changes to the plan laid out by Bush this morning because he had yet not examined the exact details.

    Bush however, has handed off to Obama his probable first and major difficult decision when he becomes President regarding our economy.  Then his administration must politically and economically judge whether GM and Chrysler have become financially viable at the end of March.  If his new team concludes that the automakers have not become financially viable, it means bankruptcy for GM and Chrysler and widespread layoffs far beyond the automakers.  Meanwhile, Bush has insured that the automakers do not fall on his presidential watch, while it will be up to Obama and his administration to determine if GM and Chrysler are viable, and possibly fall.

    CERBERUS

    Cerberus owns 80 percent in Chrysler.  The White House package strips away the requirement that Cerebrus be held liable for any losses experienced by the taxpayers.  Lawmakers, both Democrat and Republican, have expressed outrage that Cerebrus, which is profitable, had refused to put up any more cash aid to Chrysler. 

    In an emailed statement, Cerberus said that it will hand over equity in the company’s automotive operations to labor and creditors as part of the loan agreement.  “Concessions by all relevant constituencies” are needed to restructure Chrysler.  The fund agreed today to put up another $2 billion into Chrysler.  Administration officials said the investment effectively put Cerberus on the hook for far more than just the government loan, and that taxpayers were being protected through tough restrictions imposed in the loan agreements – including provisions that would give the government an equity stake in GM and Chrysler.

    RANT ON

    First of all, this is a bailout plan, plain and simple.  Sure, the White House will point to a long list of requirement in the deal’s terms as proof that this isn’t just another bailout.  But that’s bogus:  this is a politically-driven plan and none of the important concessions listed by the White House are binding or likely to happen.  That’s because, unlike in bankruptcy court, this bailout offers no accountability.  There is a zero chance that the government will require GM or Chrysler to pay back these loans if they are unable to right themselves by March. 

    Second, the “deal” is non-binding.  Detroit could come back and simply say they haven’t obtained “viability” because no one is buying cars.  That’s their ticket out.

    Third, it’s an end-run around our representative democracy.  Congress spent over one month debating whether and how to support the automakers and, in the end, decided to put no taxpayer money on the line.  The White House’s action today nullifies that congressional decision, violating the constitutional command that the legislative branch makes law and the executive branch enforces it.

    Forth, it’s just a downpayment.  According to industry analysts and economists (e.g., Mark Zandi) future bailouts, or even bankruptcy, are inevitable.  How much will it cost?  Zandi says up to $150 billion.

    Fifth, according to the terms, if the auto makers have “not attained viability by March 31, 2009, the loan will be called and all funds returned to the Treasury.”  What if they auto makers haven’t attained viability, and they don’t have any money to pay it back immediately?

    Sixth, there nothing in the loan terms to keep Detroit from continuing layoffs and sending jobs to Mexico.

    Seventh, is another small problem:  this bailout is ILLEGAL.  The administration does not have the legal authority to use funds from the bank bailout in this way.  Congress earmarked that money for “financial institutions,” which the UAW automakers clearly are not.  The funds were to be used to restore liquidity and stability in the overall financial system, not to help nonfinancial corporate companies in distress because of  the UAW.

    And finally, the fact is that this bailout probably isn’t going to work.  Put simply, if the goal is turning the automakers around to achieve long-term profitability, this bailout is clearly inferior to a straightforward reorganization under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code, which so many large corporations have relied upon to escape dire financial straights and return to profitability.  A bailout actually makes achieving this goal less likely.

    And then there is the fact that auto sales have been SLASHED at record lows.  Detroit can continue to make cars however, who is going to be buying them? 

    And where is the “car czar” in all of this?  Oh yea, its the U.S. Treasury secretary, and we all know how good he’s been with that, right?

    SIDE RANT

    Why aren’t the same type of restrictions or concessions given to the “too big to fail” banks, who are still laying off workers, paying stockholders, paying bonuses, buying other banks, increasing interest rates on current balances on credit cards, and not making any credit available to consumers and businesses?

    And do I feel sorry for current employees and retirees who benefits may end up being cut 60% in the end?  Nope.  Why should they be any different from any other American who is suffering right now?  Join the recession with the rest of the country where you must choose between housing, food and health care.  And if you say the UAW has acquired rights to those items, then why doesn’t the rest of the country have the same?

    As for those who paid into the pension fund, and may not get those funds?  Well, what about all the millions of people who have paid into FICA, and come to find out, those funds are probably going to be gone and thus then what?   I paid in enough funds within a 10 year period to acquire enough points to be eligible to retire and eligible for disability.  Why do I have to wait at least 32 years AFTER that to be eligible for 70% of my retirement benefits, and wait a total of 37 years AFTER I’ve paid in enough to be eligible for 100% of my measly $1000 a month.  Can I have interest on all that money over the years?  Nope.

    There is the option of the 401(k) however, the Democrats in Congress want to seize those funds.

    And why do average US workers, making $10 to $15 a hour, if not less, have to pay taxes to support the UAW for workers who make two or three times those hourly wages, not including all their benefits?

    The UAW has blood on their hands while we, the US taxpayers have dirt in our faces.

    MEANWHILE

    A bailout for Wall Street was done in days in Congress.  A bailout for the auto makers was done in a few weeks.  Why is it taking MONTHS to do a bailout for US taxpayers?  In the meantime, the US taxpayer, who is suffering from record high foreclosures and unemployment get to move into their new digs while the UAW wants to make sure that their workers have everything they have had in the past.  A box under an interstate, or bridge. Are you going to choose a refrigerator box or build one from wooden skids?

    If Unions are so good for the economy, then why are automakers in trouble?  If the auto workers are so good, then why are the US made cars mostly sub-standard compared to foreign autos?  And if UAW made cars are so good, then why isn’t the import car industry in trouble?  Why aren’t the import companies screaming for bailouts?  Why is Detroit in so much trouble, but the import auto companies not?  What is their difference?  The UAW.

    Let the auto workers know what it’s like to have to sleep in one of their own cars in the middle of winter as a home or they can take pay cuts and come back to Earth with the rest of the United States and suffer along with everyone else.   Settle with something, and not nothing.  The UAW’s greed will be the downfall of at least GM.  Greed and Vanity are two of my favorite sins.

    FINAL NOTE

    I never thought I would say this, but Bush is a smart man.  If you don’t understand that statement on the “loans”, then you are obviously not getting the ‘whole picture” and /or are an Obama supporter.

    SOURCES:

  • Click Here To Read The Rest Of This Post! (Opens in a new window.)

    What The Obama Press Release About Rahm Amanuel Left Out [The Past]

    11/07/2008 08:50:00 PM

    (0) Comments

    rahm So what exactly is a "Chief of Staff", who is Rahm Amanuel, and how does he have anything to do with Obama's "American Serves" plans?  A lot actually... read on.

    A Chief of Staff is in charge of delivering the president's policy platform.  He also acts as the president's most senior advisor and right hand man, counseling him and attempting to get his proposals passed by Congress.  He also guards the door to the Oval Office and needs to be able to say 'no' when the president needs him to.

    And Rahm Amanuel, aka "Rahmbo", is Obama's selection for Chief of Staff.  Rahm is a Democratic member of the House of Reps, and has been since only 2003.  He represents Illinois's 5th congressional district, which covers much of the north side of Chicago, Obama's home town, and parts of suburban Cook County.    He is a member of the New Democrat Coalition, and a central proponent of neo-liberal economic policies in his capacity as an advisor during the Clinton administration to direct the campaign's finance committee.

    Here are a few things that the Obama "press release" seems to have forgotten to mention about Rham.

    THE PAST

    Rahm's father is an Israeli-born doctor who was once a member of the Irgun, a group which fought for Israeli independence until 1948 and was branded as a terrorist organization by the British colonial authorities.  His mother meanwhile, worked as an X-ray technician and was the daughter of a local Chicago union organizer.  She was a civil rights activist but is now a psychiatric social worker.  The two met in Chicago in the 1950s.

    Rahm was born in 1959 and attended Bernard Zell Anshe Emet Day School, a Jewish day school.  After his family moved to Wilmette, he attended public school.  He and his brothers attended summer cap in Israel. 

    He graduated from Sarah Lawrence College in 1981, and went on to receive a master's degree in Speech and Communication from Northwestern University in 1985.

    In 1991, Rahm volunteered to serve in Israel's army during the first Gulf War of 1991 - rust-proofing brakes in northern military bases, Israeli media reports (via the BBC, Ynetnews).

    Back in the US, Rahm became the director of finance for Bill Clinton's presidential campaign in 1992 continuing on as a senior advisor to President Clinton from 1993 to 1998.  He has stated that one of his proudest moments during the Clinton administration "was an event that touched his political sensibilities and his personal ties to Israel:  the 1993 Rose Garden signing ceremony after the Oslo Accords between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).  Emanuel directed the details of the ceremony, down to the choreography of the famous handshake between Israeli Prime Minister Yitzahk Rabin and PLO leader Yasser Arafat."

    Emanuel has also said to have "mailed a two-and-a-half foot rotting fish to a former coworker (pollster) after the two parted ways."  On the night of the 1996 election, "Emanuel was so angry at the president's enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the campaign, grabbed a steak knife and began rattling off a list of betrayers, shouting 'Nat Landow!  Dead! Cliff Jackson!  Dead!  Bill Schaefer!  Dead!' and plunging the knife into the table after every name." (Additional source:  NYT)  BTW, this is the same man who stated that "the bottom line is Clinton did not have sex with Lewinsky and did not ask her to lie."

    After Clinton's Presidency was over, Rahm joined Wasserstein Perella & Co as a partner in the firm's Chicago office, focusing on merchant banking, strategic advisory, and mergers & acquisitions.  During his time working for Wasserstein, he reportedly earned $18 million from 1999 to 2002.

    Emanuel was also on the Board of Directors for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation aka "Freddie Mac" in 2000, which puts him right in the middle of the Freddie Mac scandal when Freddie Mac misreported profits by billions of dollars in order to deceive investors between the years of 2000 and 2002.  Emanuel was not named in the SEC complaint however, the entire board was later accused [PDF] by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) of having "failed in its duty to follow up on matters brought to its attention."  During this time, Rahm was paid $231,655 in directors fees in 2001 and $31,060 in 2000.

    He resigned from the board in 2001 when he ran for congress.  He has been a member of the House of Reps since 2003. 

    Since 2002, Rahm has  reportedly been the beneficiary of campaign cash from Freddie Mac and its sister organization Fannie Mae - $51,750 according to the Center for Responsive Politics Web site, OpenSecrets.org.

    In 2008 Contributions, Emanuel "was the top House recipient in the 2008 election cycle of contributions from hedge funds, private equity firms and the larger securities/investment industry."  Since Emanuel's election to Congress in 2002, Emanuel has received more money from individuals and PAC's in the securities and investment business than any other industry.

    In a November 6, 2008 article, it was stated that Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel has an active FBI counter-intelligence file maintained on him, and it may pose a significant security problem for Obama if the FBI insists on conducting the full background security investigation normally required for senior White House officials.  Questions about Emanuel's links to the Israeli intelligence service, the Mossad [Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations, the national intelligence agency of Israel], were allegedly so great that President Bill Clinton was forced to dismiss Emanuel from the White House staff in 1998.

    AMERICA SERVES, RHAM'S 2006 VIEW

    Rahm supports a plan to send 18-25 years olds into compulsory service which goes along with Obamas "Change.Gov" website plans for "America Serves".   This is an excerpt from Bruce Reed and Rahm Emanuel's 2006 book, The Plan:  Big Ideas for America.  You can read some of this yourself via Google's Book Search

    In the introduction to the book it is stated:

    "This book is a first draft of the new conditions, new requirements, and new terms that our new era will demand."

    Chapter 4:  What's The Plan?, pg. 54

    "THE PLAN

    A NEW SOCIAL CONTRACT, OR WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR YOUR COUNTRY AND WHAT YOUR COUNTRY CAN DO FOR YOU

    The economy of the twenty-first century demands new skills and will require all of us to live up to new responsibilities.  We believe that four mutual obligations that follow should represent the first terms of a new contract between the people and their country.

    Universal Citizen Service

    If you forget everything else you read in these pages, please remember this:  The Plan starts with you.  If your leaders aren't challenging you to do your part, they aren't doing theirs.  We need a real Patriot Act that brings out the patriot in all of us by establishing, for the first time, an ethic of universal citizen service.  All Americans between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five should be asked to serve their country by going through three months of basic civil defense training and community service.  This is not a draft - nor is it military.  Young people will be trained not as soldiers, but simply as citizens who understand their responsibilities...."

    From Chapter 5, "ASKED NOT:  Universal Citizen Service" , pg. 60

    "THE CASE FOR UNIVERSAL CITIZEN SERVICE

    Every citizen needs to understand and accept the essence of the American bargain:  Each of us has to do his or her part.  While the rights of citizenship are explicit in our Constitution, the implicit responsibilities are every bit as crucial.

    From our radical experiement in freedom to work, we must prize responsibilities as well as rights, and never presume to do for people what they can do for themselves.

    After 9/11, both parties in Washington spent countless hours debating a law called the Patriot Act, which gave federal authorities new powers to police terrorism.  We're all for giving law enforcement the tools to do its job; the two of us helped write legislation to do just that (which the Republican Congress largely rejected) after domestic terrorists blew up the federal building in Oklahoma City in 1995.  We have no problem spying on terrorists, here or elsewhere.  Indeed, as we'll explain later, we believe the U.S. should strengthen its domestic counterterrorism capacity in a way that also safeguards our freedoms.

    Our problem with the Patriot Act is simpler:  It doesn't have much to do wtih patriotism.  We want the government to be aggressive in protecting us from terrorists.  But we want a government that's just as serious about challenging us as citizens.  Americans' role in the war on terror is not simply to be waving flags on the sidelines.

    It's time for a real Patriot Act that brings out the patriot in all of us.  We propose universal civilian service for every young American.  Under this plan, all Americans between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five will be asked to serve their country by going through three months of basic training, civil defense preparation, and community service. 

    This is not a draft.  We repeat:  This is not a draft.  It's not military either.  We're not asking young people to be soldiers, but to be citizens - ready to respond to the nation's needs here at home.

    The idea of universal civilian service may not be popular everywhere in our party.  Some Republicans will squeal about individual freedom, forgetting their own rhetoric that freedom isn't being free.  But universal service is the right thing to do, and our country will be stronger for it.

    Here's how it would work.  Young people will know that between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five, the nation will enlist them for three months of civilian training in their state or community, where they will learn what to do in the event of biochemical, nuclear, or conventional attack; how to assist others in an evacuation; how to respond when a levee breaks or we're hit by a natural disaster.  These young people will be available to address their communities' most pressing needs.

    In the 1990s, Bill Clinton and the late Eli Segal launched AmeriCorps, which has given more than 400,000 young people the chance to serve their community. ...

    By asking every young American to serve, universal civilian service will strengthen America in three vital ways.

    First, it will provide real, lasting security benefits. ...

    Second, universal civilian service may be just what we need to save the volunteer army and avoid a draft. ...

    Third, and most important, universal service will give young people a chance early in their lives to look past differences of race, class, creed, and region, and to see themselves and one another first and foremost as Americans.

    Other Rham Articles:

    Emanuel Attended A Meeting With Clinton Campaign Advisers Following The 1992 Campaign To Discuss Which Politicians And Members Of The Press They Would Seek Revenge Upon:

    “It was there that Emanuel, then Clinton’s chief fund-raiser, repaired with George Stephanopoulos, Mandy Grunwald and other aides to Doe’s, the campaign hangout. Revenge was heavy in the air as the group discussed the enemies — Democrats, Republicans, members of the press — who wronged them during the 1992 campaign. Clifford Jackson, the ex-friend of the President and peddler of the Clinton draft-dodging stories, was high on the list. So was William Donald Schaefer, then the Governor of Maryland and a Democrat who endorsed George Bush. Nathan Landow, the fund-raiser who backed the candidacy of Paul Tsongas, made it, too.” (Elisabeth Bumiller, “The Brothers Emanuel,” The New York Times, 6/15/97)

    Emanuel Told His Staff That Republicans Could “Go F— Themselves!”

    “‘I’ll tell you this,’ Emanuel shouted out to his staff. ‘The Republicans may have the 72-hour program. But they have not seen the 22-month program! … Since my kids are gone, I can say it: They can go —- themselves!’”(Naftali Bendavid, “The House That Rahm Built,” Chicago Tribune, 11/12/06)

    Emanuel’s Political Style Was “Honed In Chicago” And Has A “Reputation As A Political Street Fighter.”

    “But his political style — honed in Chicago and on the presidential campaign trail with Clinton — isn’t gentle or uncertain. His reputation as a political street fighter inspires respect and more than a little fear.”(Naftali Bendavid, “The House That Rahm Built,” Chicago Tribune, 11/12/06)

    “[Emanuel] Was Also Zealously Partisan. He Had Once Owned A Consulting Business Devoted To Finding Skeletons In Republican Closets.” (Edward McClelland, “The Legend Of Rahm,” Salon.Com, 5/8/07)

    And Emanuel Made Millions As An Investment Banker Off Insider Connections With High-Profile Democrat Donors Influential In The Clinton Administration:
    After Leaving His Position With The Clinton White House, Emanuel Worked For Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, An Investment Bank, From 1999 To 2002.

    “[A]fter leaving the Clinton White House, [Emanuel] had taken a position at the investment bank Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein in Chicago, where he worked from 1999 to 2002 and reportedly earned $18 million…” (Tony Blankley, “‘Cowboy Capitalism,’” The Washington Times, 10/1/08)

    “Congressional Disclosures Filed This Year Show Emanuel Earned $16.2 Million As An Investment Banker, Largely By Brokering High-Profile Mergers And Acquisitions.” (Mike Dorning, “Rahm Emanuel: From Clinton Aide To Money Maker,” Chicago Tribune, 11/9/03)

    “Deftly Tapping The Contacts He Made As A Senior Adviser To Former President Bill Clinton, Emanuel Went To Work For One Of Clinton’s Most Active Fundraisers After Leaving The White House In Late 1998.” (Mike Dorning, “Rahm Emanuel: From Clinton Aide To Money Maker,” Chicago Tribune, 11/9/03)

    “Emanuel Owes His Investment Banking Job To Bruce Wasserstein, A High-Rolling Wall Street Dealmaker Who Was One Of Clinton’s Most Active Fundraisers In The Financial Community.” (Mike Dorning, “Rahm Emanuel: From Clinton Aide To Money Maker,” Chicago Tribune, 11/9/03)

    “Emanuel’s Two Biggest Deals Involved Politically Connected Utilities: One Representing Commonwealth Edison’s Corporate Parent In A Merger And The Other Representing A Buyer In The Purchase Of A Home Security Business From Telecom Giant SBC Communications.”(Mike Dorning, “Rahm Emanuel: From Clinton Aide To Money Maker,” Chicago Tribune, 11/9/03)

    “Shortly Afterward, SBC Hired As Its President William Daley, The Commerce Secretary Of The Former Clinton Administration And The Brother Of Chicago’s Mayor.” (Mike Dorning, “Rahm Emanuel: From Clinton Aide To Money Maker,” Chicago Tribune, 11/9/03)

    Click Here To Read The Rest Of This Post! (Opens in a new window.)